|
Photo Gallery | About Us | Terms of Use | Register/Create a Profile |
How can this be brought about in practical terms? Because of the entrenched nature of these issues - is it a best practice for whites to be "non-interventionists"? Meaning Ron Pauls instead of RTP liberals? If "whites" took care of their own communities by invested in their own communities, instead of investing in the global system of white supremacy that gave them returns - even though parochial and potentially nativist - what kind of impact could that have on people of other communities? Whites are upset because the guaranteed returns of globalization are not guaranteed anymore, the pensions, 401k's, etc. The system is turning on itself and if the discourse is framed correctly means that "whites" not of the 1% may potentially acknowledge some common ground with the 99%. However the entrenched nature of these hierarchies may in fact be impossible to overcome which leads me to my question - what is the best practice? If racism cannot be overcome - is it best for "Whites" to be localized and racist instead of globalized and racist?
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |