Rasta TimesCHAT ROOMArticles/ArchiveRaceAndHistory RootsWomen Trinicenter
Africa Speaks.com Africa Speaks HomepageAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.com
InteractiveLeslie VibesAyanna RootsRas TyehimbaTriniView.comGeneral Forums
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
February 19, 2020, 07:41:24 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
25874 Posts in 9949 Topics by 982 Members Latest Member: - Ferguson Most online today: 150 (July 03, 2005, 06:25:30 PM)
+  Africa Speaks Reasoning Forum
|-+  AFRICA AND THE DIASPORA
| |-+  Human Beginnings (Moderator: Tyehimba)
| | |-+  The Lost Tribe: Part II
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: The Lost Tribe: Part II  (Read 15122 times)
PatriotWarrior
Newbie
*
Posts: 67


« on: May 30, 2004, 10:29:11 AM »



This is the second and concluding part of Amani Olubanjo Buntu’s wide-ranging piece on the history of the African glory and downfall in Asia, the merit of which is to question the white European scholars’ view of African civilisations. You may agree or disagree with the views expressed. But they give food for thought:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Bangladeshi researcher Horen Tudu has devoted much of his work to the Dalit * (or The Untouchables) question in Bangladesh and India. He explains that the original inhabitants of modern-day Bangladesh were the Proto-Australoid Kols, a Dravidian group, descended from Africa.

Kol, as a term, has been corrupted by Aryan-Sanskritic speakers to the word kalu, meaning both “black” and “ugly” in almost all of the 16 languages of the Indian sub-continent.

The indigenous people were “long-headed, dark-skinned, broad-nosed and short in stature. Sometimes labelled as ‘Negritos’ and ‘Negroids’, their physical features are unchanged to this day, among the lowest castes of Bengal.”

As Muslims invaded North India and present-day Pakistan and Bangladesh around the 8th century, their religion gained much support from the “Untouchables”. Islam allowed them, for the first time in their lives, to reach some form of upward mobility in society.

Similar to the lower-than-low status allocated to Dalits under Hinduism, Arabs have also subdued the indigenous black populations to servant status. In Bangladesh, even those of mixed Arab and Bengali descent look down on the black people and call them “village kalus” (equivalent to “nigger”), and remain highly bigoted with regard to skin colour.

West and Central Asia, Middle East*

The first civilisation in the region of Mesopotamia was established by the Sumerians* between the Tigris and the Euphrates river valleys in the southern part of today’s Iraq. The first settlements of Sumer date from, possibly, as early as 5,300 BC.

A major element in the Sumerian civilisation*, says the African-American historian and researcher Runoko Rashidi, were black migrants from the Nile Valley who called themselves “Blackheads”. Research suggests that the biological make-up of the Sumerians was the same as that of the Ancient Egyptians, the Dogon of West Africa and the indigenous Australians, the Aborigines.

The city of Ur, from where Abraham and his family started their journey to Canaan in the Bible, was probably the most powerful Sumerian city of its era. Prospering during the third millennium BC, Sumer set the guidelines for kingdoms and empires  that followed it.

The Sumerians* built temples, were advanced in agriculture and fishing and developed the first writing system known to Asia. Ur was fundamentally destroyed around 2,000 BC by the Semites, who became the new masters in the land. This had a devastating effect, ending the era of Sumerian rule. Around 3,000 BC arose the ancient federal state of Elam, situated in Persia, today’s Iran. Iranian legends hold that the ancient Persians were black people with short woolly hair. As with the Sumerians, the cultural forms, the goddesses, art-motifs, weapons and scripts of the Elamites point back to a Nile Valley origin. In fact, many scholars see both Sumer and Elam as Kushite colonies. The ruling dynasties of these two cultures had many significant female leaders and queens.

As with Sumer, Elam also fell victim to destructive Semitic invasions. According to Rashidi, when the Assyrians took over the capital Susa in 639 BC, they attempted to destroy it completely by “the looting and razing of temples, the destruction of sacred groves, the desecration of royal tombs, the seizure of Elamite gods, the removal of royal memorials and the deportation of people, livestock and even rubble from the devastated city.”

The anthropologist and historian Wayne B. Chandler explains how Africans were once dominant over the entire Arabian Peninsula, and were the “original” Arabs. From what is today Yemen, several city-sates and kingdoms spread throughout the region. Yemen and Saudi Arabia were part of the ancient Kushite Empire.

The Sabean Empire, established in 700 BC, was an extension of Ethiopia and was ruled by a line of queens, Kentakes/Kandakes (called Candace by the Greeks). According to Drusilla D. Houston, this line of queens physically resembled the San peoples.

The most famous was Queen Makeda (Bilqis in the Koran, Queen Sheba in the Bible), under whose rule the empire flourished and became widely famous. She visited King Solomon of Israel (also of African descent) and placed her son with the king on the throne of Ethiopia, starting a line that was the last until Emperor Ras Tafari, Haile Selassie I.

The family line of Prophet Muhammad, the Koreysh, were also from Saudi Arabia. The Koreysh traced their lineage from Ishmael, son of Abraham and his Egyptian (Hamitic) wife, Hagar. Ishmael has been ultimately called the “Father of Arabs”. Being from a lineage of African blood, research suggests that Prophet Muhammad was probably born to a black Arabic father and a Semitic (racially mixed) mother.

Prophet Muhammad’s descendants, the Arabs of the south, established the advanced Abbasids Empire that conquered all of Arabia in 750 AD. This empire, says Charles B. Copher, ushered in a period of wealth, knowledge and advancement at a time when Europe was entering its Dark Ages. Attacked by Mongols, this powerful empire came to its end in 1,258 AD. This closed the chapter of black people as a natural force in West Asia.

The Semitic Arabs, according to Drusilla D. Houston, were nomadic and did not excel in agriculture and political organisation. They occupied the harshest (northern) parts of Arabia and were involved in constant quarrels over wells and grazing lands.

Apparently of mixed African, Caucasian and Asiatic descent, they claimed descent from Heber, of the race of Shem, from whom also descends the line of Abraham. They remained relatively obscure until 700 AD. Around the 6th century (AD), they established a hierarchy built on what they had learned from the Yemenites, but altered it to their own advantage.

The African-American historian Yusuf Ben-Jochanan has documented how both Judaism/Christianity and Islam -- (in that order) -- are religions which were crafted out of African religion; both in content (rituals, mythology, dogmas), though distorted from the original, and by the many Africans who were essential in the creation of these religions.

Prophet Muhammad also surrounded himself with other Africans who had a profound impact on Islam. The most well-known is perhaps Bilal, the first Imam (high priest), Muezzin (prayer-caller) and treasurer of the Mohammedan Empire. Born in Ethiopia, he was captured by Arab slavers and taken to Mecca before the birth of Islam in 622 AD. The first convert of Islam, Bilal was responsible for the creation of much of the Muslim doctrines.

Another distinguished African-Arab was Ibrahim Al-Mahdi, who became Islam’s greatest singer, poet and Caliph of Baghdad. Also famous was the African-Iraqi Al-Jahiz, who was born towards the end of the 7th century. He was an outstanding scholar and chronicled great achievements of the African people.

Even before the advent of Islam, southern Arabia already possessed the sacred Ka’aba, with its black stone, and Mecca was considered a holy place, a destination for Pilgrims. According to Ben-Jochanan, the Ka’aba stone was imported into Arabia by the Ethiopians as a symbol devoted to several female deities.

But in the 7th century, Islamic Arabs introduced a form of chattel slavery previously unheard-of in the history of Africa. This instituted a framework for slavery which the Europeans would later copy and capitalise on. Africans from East, South and Central Africa were captured, "bought" or kidnapped and shipped off to Saudi Arabia, Persia, India and East Timor to become slaves for Muslim overlords.

In Iraq, African slaves came to be known as the Zanj, a word related to Azania, which means ”land of the black people”. In 868 AD, the African slaves in Arabia staged the Zanj Revolt: a 15-year-long rebellion against their oppressors, which reduced the slave trade.

The Arab slave trade, through the routes across the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, is estimated to have shipped 14 million Africans to Arabia, Persia and India between 650 and 1,900 AD.

Many people in Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia today still carry the physical characteristics of Africans, although few identify with these African origins. Blackness there, as in so many parts of the world where Africans have been forcibly migrated, carries a social stigma.

Pilgrims travelling to Mecca (the Hajj) have over the years resulted in large numbers of Africans settling throughout the Middle East. Many never returned to their native lands, and established themselves in present-day Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Palestine/Israel, Iran, Lebanon, Yemen, the Persian Gulf countries and Turkey.

There are also present-day descendants of ancient Africans who founded civilisations in Turkey, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Afghanistan. The historian John G. Jackson talks of the Colchis in southern Russia, where there is still today a “Black belt” of African people, descendants of Ancient Egyptians who established a colony there under the Pharaoh Sesostris.

The ancient coastal provinces of today’s Lebanon, northern Israel and Syria, were named Phoenicia by the Greeks. The Phoenicians were a coastal branch of the Canaanites, who, according to Biblical traditions, were members of the Hamitic (Black) ethnic group.

The Phoenicians were the great seafarers of their time and dominated the Mediterranean Sea. Phoenician inscriptions have been found as far north as central Turkey and as far west as Tunisia, where the famous ancient city of Carthage was founded.

Contrary to popularised images of Biblical characters, many, both in the Old and the New Testaments, were of African lineage. The physical characteristic of Jesus Christ has been a controversial debate for a long time.

According to the historian-philosopher James C. Anyike, it is difficult to establish Biblical and historical consensus about the life of Jesus. Since the early years of Christendom, however, depictions of the Black Virgin and Child, both with distinct African features, have been central. Many of these sculptures are still found in ancient cathedrals of South and Eastern Europe.


The British researcher J.A. Rogers has also substantiated claims that there were several messiahs before the Biblical Jesus Christ. The stories of Osiris (Horus) of Egypt, Krishna of India and Buddha of East Asia have similarities: virgin birth, disciple followers, dying and rising from death. All have been depicted as African in origin since ancient times.

The process of portraying Jesus and most Biblical characters as white was not invented before the 15th century. As confirmed by the Biblical researcher Walter Arthur McGray, his genealogy makes Jesus a descendant of African people, as the Hamites were African and most Semites were of some African blood.

So who were the Hamitic and Semitic peoples? These terms are often used without any further explanation. James C. Anyike and Charles B. Copher attempt to clarify this question. According to the Bible’s Table of Nations, Noah had three sons, who have been seen to be the forefathers of human races: Ham (Hamites/Africans), Shem (Semites/Asians) and Japhet (Caucasians).

Early European historians identified all Hamites as “Negroes” and associated this with Noah’s curse of Canaan, interpreted to be a curse of Ham and his descendants. But, according to biblical accounts, Ham was never cursed, nor is colour mentioned.

However, when 19th century European scholars increasingly came across African civilisations and great kingdoms which were unmistakably black, they invented a curious “twist” in their “construction” of the races, so that they did not have to ascribe advanced achievements to the “sub-human Negroes”.

This view removed colour from the criteria for determining racial identity and re-invented the Hamites as “dark-skinned whites”, “copper-coloured”, “Eurafrican”, “Mediterranean” or “Caucasoid blacks”. The word “Negro” was removed from biblical history and the Hamites were made “white”.

According to Copher, research proves that wherever the Bible refers to Hamites, these are people who, today, would be called Black/African. Both Semites and Hamites probably belonged to the same (or similar) people. The ancient Hebrew-Israelites were also of African blood. The Japhets we don’t hear much about in the Bible … It was apparently this feeling of being “left out” that led Europeans to re-invent the biblical history with white images.


The Hebrews

The Hebrews, as portrayed by Charles B. Copher, claim their history starts with Noah. It is unclear what “race” they were originally, but they certainly became Africanised as they advanced. Several scholars accept that the Hebrews “borrowed the flood myth” from Sumer (when they reached Ur). It was, also, as they drifted southward that they dwelt in Palestine (Canaan, a black nation) and adopted a Semitic language. They probably spoke an Indo-European language originally.

As James Anyike explains, Abraham was the son of Terah, who descended from Heber. He and his family started the journey from Ur, a city-state in Sumer (a region of black people), around 2,100 BC.

Abraham’s children and grandchildren were largely of Egyptian/African blood. Abraham’s grandson, Jacob, had several children by Egyptian and Syrian women ... and hence gave birth to the Twelve Tribes of Israel. Around 1,700 BC, Jacob and his family moved to Egypt. The people who would later be called Jews actually became a nation during their stay in Egypt. They acquired from African people all elements of their future religion, tradition and culture.

The African-American historian John Henrik Clarke says: “Whatever the Jews were before they entered Africa, they left, 400 years later, ethnically, culturally and religiously, an African people.”

The Israelites’ Exodus, led by Moses, began around 1,491 BC. Essentially, the Israelites left Egypt as Egyptian people (called Ethiopians by the Romans). It was the Egyptians who introduced them to the custom of circumcision and the practice of monotheism (the belief in one, supreme God).

The Khazar Jews

Hebrews claim descent from Abraham and Sarah’s son, Isaac, including family lineage of David, culminating in Jesus. The majority of Jewish people today are seen to be white, which might appear contradictory to research claiming that the ancient Hebrews were Africans. James Anyike explains that the Jews today are predominantly descendants of the Jews who lived in Eastern Europe.

As the Roman Empire adopted Christianity, Jews were persecuted, sparking off a Jewish dispersion. The Turkish Empire of Khazar adopted Judaism in 740 AD to retain their alliances in a highly political climate. As they were defeated by the Russians in 965 AD, many fled and settled in (modern-day) Germany and Poland. These are the Khazar Jews, who are Jews by faith but not Hebrew or Israelites by descent.

The “Falashas”

In virtually all regions of Africa, there are people who claim Israel or Palestine as their place of origin. White Jews in Europe, America and Israel did not, for a long time, recognise the Black Jews as “genuine”. The most well-known Black Jews are probably the “Falashas” of Ethiopia.

The word falasha (meaning “gone” or “gone into exile” in the ancient Ge’ez language) is a term imposed on the Jewish people of Ethiopia, seen as derogatory; and the community prefers Beta Israel, a Hebrew term for House of Israel. Their history goes back 2,500 years and they claim their lineage from Menelik, the son of the Queen of Sheba and King Solomon. They also see themselves as the descendants of the 10 lost tribes of Israel, the Dan.

Victims of persecution, discrimination and displacement in Ethiopia, thousands of Ethiopian Jews were finally granted permission to return to Israel in 1984 and 1991. The Israeli government had previously only recognised the returning White Jews as Jews. However, discrimination continues to dominate the lives of the 60,000 Ethiopian Jews in Israel, where they face racism and segregation. Most live in poor, segregated towns where unemployment is high (see New African, Nov. 2002; pp. 56-59).

There is also a growing number of African Hebrew Israelites, born in the USA and in the Caribbean, who are returning to live in Israel.

FAR EAST ASIA:

Runoko Rashidi has done extensive research on the African presence in Ancient Asia, particularly South Asia and the Far East. His research is thorough in that it builds on general history, notes by European and Asian travellers, archaeological, biological and linguistic research and also his own travel experience. The following is largely a summary of his findings: - ...

CHINA*

Africans called “black dwarfs” appear in the early history of China. According to the research of Rashidi, the first Chinese emperor, Fu-His (2,953 – 2,838 BC), was a woolly-haired black man. Also, the Shang Dynasty (1,766 – 1,100 BC) was largely a black dynasty. The Shang were given the name of Nakhi (meaning “black man”) by the Moso, because of their very dark complexions. The Chou, who conquered the Shang, described them as having black skin.

There are also numerous other descriptions of African people throughout Eastern and Southern China. In Taiwan, there are recollections of a group of people now said to be extinct called “little Black men”. Rashidi writes: “They were described as short, dark-skinned people with short, curly hair. These people, presumably Negritos, disappeared about 100 years ago. Their existence was mentioned in many Chinese documents of the Ching Dynasty concerning Taiwan.

JAPAN*

As confirmed by many scholars, it seems indisputable that black people in Japan played an important role from at least the earliest phases of antiquity to (latest by) the ninth century.

In 1923, the anthropologist Roland B. Dixon wrote that the “earliest population of Japan was, in the main, a blend of Proto-Australoid and Proto-Negroid types, and thus similar in the ancient underlying stratum of the population, southward along the whole coast and throughout Indo-China, and beyond to India itself.

A hypothesis presented by the great Senegalese scholar Cheikh Anta Diop argues that “the yellow race must be the result of an interbreeding of black and white in a cold climate.” This view was supported by several Japanese scholars and researchers. The former Senegalese president and scholar Leopold Sedar Senghor maintained in 1987 that “the first population of Japan was black … and gave to Japan their first language.”

Of the black people of early Japan, the most picturesque single figure was Sakanouyeno Tamuramaro (758 – 811), a warrior, symbolised in Japanese history as a “paragon of military virtues”.

According to the historian James Murdoch, Tamuramaro was “the originator of what was subsequently to develop into the renowned samurai class”. He was not only the first to bear the title of Sei-i-tai-Shogun, the highest rank to which a warrior could aspire, but he was also the first of the warrior statesmen of Japan. An ancient Japanese proverb also states that “for a Samurai to be brave, he must have a bit of black blood”.

VIETNAM*

Runoko Rashidi writes that early Chinese records make reference to a kingdom in what is now central Vietnam, known as Lin-yi, which meant the “land of black men”. Its inhabitants possessed “black skin, eyes deep in the orbit, nose turned up, hair frizzy.”

The kingdom of Lin-yi was known in Sanskrit documents as Champa and remained in close contact with India and China. Some hold that the Cham came in from the Melanesian region; some say that they were colonists from India. Either way, says Rashidi, it is clear that the Cham dominated the region for centuries.

The Cham were great mariners and built ships, known to the Chinese as kun-lun-bo (the “vessels of black men”), which navigated the currents of the Indian Ocean ranging from Southeast Asia to Madagascar.

Visiting Vietnam in 2001, Rashidi wrote: “The Cham Museum in Da Nang has many of the finest objects of Cham art in the world and is just magnificent. Many of the pieces are as Africoid (dark skin, full lips, broad noses) as any art that you will ever see, and is a "must-see" for any African who goes to Vietnam.

PHILIPPINES

The original inhabitants of the Philippines are the Agta. They are African people who, although presently in small numbers, still exist in the country and are pejoratively referred to as Pygmies and Negritos and a variety of other names, based upon their specific locale.

In regards to phenotype, broadly speaking, the Agta can be described as physically small and unusually short in stature, dark-skinned, spiral-haired and broad-nosed. Rashidi describes them as “an extremely ancient people”. Small groups of similar black people reside on the many islands of the Bay of Bengal, the Indian Ocean, the South China Sea and the East Asia mainland. Related to the San, the Twa and the Khoi of Southern Africa, it is clearly a human tragedy that the advanced contributions of these African people remain essentially obscure.

CAMBODIA*

Research of the Khmers* of the Cambodian kingdom of Angkor reveals some interesting findings. John G. Jackson writes about the kingdom of Angkor and points out that “these Asiatic black men were in fact the Khmers, who were the dominant people in south-eastern Asia for 600 years. The centre of this culture was in Cambodia, and flourished from about 800 AD to 1432; although the history of these Khmers may well be traced back to an earlier period.

Also, Western scholars have proved this point. In 1923, the Harvard University anthropologist Roland Burrage noted that the ancient Khmers were physically marked by distinctly short statures, dark skin, curly or even frizzy hair, broad nose and thick Negroid lips. In remote antiquity, the Khmers established themselves throughout a vast area that encompassed portions of the modern countries of Myanmar (or Burma), Thailand, Cambodia, Malaysia, Vietnam and Laos. According to Rashidi, the Khmers “were phenomenal builders. Among the major Angkor temple complexes were Angkor Wat, Angkor Thom, Ta Prohm and Banteay Srei.

THAILAND*

Rashidi also writes about “the extremely ancient but little known black population” of Thailand. The forest-dwelling people, called Sekai, are black people living in southern Thailand.

In addition to the Sekai, however, the black presence in Thailand is apparent in the numerous images of the Buddha. The many sculptors of the Buddha, clearly exposing African features, are well-documented. In Rashidi’s own words: “I came to the conclusion a long time ago that only a very ignorant person or a bigot could look at these beautiful sculptures and not see black people.

Many of these exceptional depictions of the African Buddha are exhibited at The National Museum of Thailand. Some go back to the cultural phase known as Mon or Dvaravati, an independent kingdom that flourished in southern Thailand from the 6th to the 11th centuries. Rashidi writes: “The Mon people, apparently highly Africoid, practised Theravada Buddhism, and it seems that the present Thais adopted Buddhism from them. Indeed, more than 95% of the Thais today are Theravada Buddhists.

AUSTRALIA AND SOUTH PACIFIC*

Researching the African origins of black or Aboriginal -- (the first-inhabitant) -- Australians, Rashidi says they are distinguished by straight to wavy hair textures and dark to near-black complexions.

Although the present-day Aboriginal Australians arrived in the land at different times, their history goes back 50,000–100,000 years! They represent many different groups and languages. Aboriginal people regard themselves as “the custodians of the land”, but apparently have no commonly-known indigenous name for Australia (in pre-European times).

The dumping of British convicts into Australia from 1788 proved catastrophic for the black population, which once numbered at least 300,000.

Rashidi describes how “the blacks were butchered and murdered like animals. They were victims of deliberate poisonings and systematic slaughters, decimated by tuberculosis and syphilis, and swept away by infectious epidemics. With their community structures and moral fibres shredded, the black people there, by the 1930s, had been reduced to a pathetic remnant of 30,000, and perhaps twice that number of mixed descent. Until the 1960s, the black people were not officially considered human beings.

The many atrocities committed against the Australian Aboriginals also include the abduction of thousands of children from their families by Australian government officials (as “government policy”).

Rashidi continues: “Today, the black people of Australia constitute only 1.6% of the total population, but black men make up 70% of the prison population. The life expectancy of a black man in Australia is less than 40 years. The infant mortality rate is among the highest in the world.

There is no consensus among the many groups of indigenous peoples as to where the Aboriginal Australians came from. The majority seems to believe that they have always been in Australia. But a growing number believes that their roots are in Africa. Most Aboriginal Australians, says Rashidi, have never met Africans from any other country, and know very little of their struggles.

SOUTH PACIFIC

Little has been written about the African origins of the many peoples scattered on the numerous islands of the South Pacific. It is believed that they arrived by canoes from the west.

European colonialism divided the islands into three regions:

  • Melanesia (North and east of Australia)
  • Polynesia (Central Pacific)
  • Micronesia (East of the Philippines)


Largely ignored by Africans in other parts of the world, there seems to be a growing process of self-discovery between the islanders themselves.

Runoko Rashidi, after a visit to Fiji, wrote:

The brothers and sisters in Fiji, dark-skinned black people who wore big, natural-type hairstyles, don’t merely identify themselves as black but said they came from Africa, and say it with great pride!

European scholars have long claimed that the island populations originally came from South Asia. This view is now increasingly being challenged. The Indian-born research specialist Rafique Ali Jairazbhoy has studied variations in mythology, religious customs, oral history and iconography throughout the entire Pacific region and concluded that there can be traced an Ancient Egyptian origin. He has also proved that the Polynesians at one time operated a direct sailing route to Madagascar.

As some of the Fijians, whom Rashidi met, said: “We, the black people in Fiji, came here a long time ago to our present homes in Fiji from Tanganyika, in East Africa. We don’t know exactly when we came to Fiji, but we know that we came from Africa.”

The EPILOGUE:

Studying the African presence around the world is as enlightening as it is challenging. To see Africans as inventors, masters, builders, rulers and founders of civilisations throughout the world certainly does not correspond with the popular perception of African development today.

Dismissed by critics as (quote) “authors of feel-good literature” constructed for Africans with a “hurt self-image”, African-centred scholars encourage all Africans to study the facts for themselves. In the 21st century, it is said that we live in the Information Age. But what kind of information forms the essence of our time? This statement inherently has an *ironic twist* -- the more we experience the available information, the more we know it is biased, deceptive and politicised.

Those who believe in a practical Pan-Africanism -- {not only held up as a philosophical ideal} -- need to embrace the challenge of studying, learning and imparting knowledge, as we seek a fuller and more truthful understanding of the African people.


{Amani Olubanjo Buntu is a lecturer/consultant at the Institute of Afrikology in South Africa}

-- Courtesy of  NEW AFRICAN, COVER STORY: The Lost Tribe PART II. November 2003.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CHECK OUT THIS LINK: The GLOBAL African Presence



POSTSCRIPT: Headings/Words marked with -- or preceding -- a “*” are also extended links clickable for more information on the respective subject/geographical location addressed.

Click HERE to read "Black History Month: The Lost Tribe, Part I".
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Copyright © 2001-2005 AfricaSpeaks.com and RastafariSpeaks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!