I 'm familiar with some of what you wrote, the rest was insightful. I've always had trouble reasoning between this theory. Most christians insist the bible is accurate in telling the creation story. Many also insist that the earth is ~6000 years old. Early creationist theories, IMO, contradiction much of what has been told throughout the history of the African people. In fact, I've read by many scholars the world is much older than this and African history has been documented to date back well before 6,000 years. If Adam, Heru, Ausar, and Osiris are all the same person and he actually did walk the face of the earth why is there such a discrepancy between the time frames of eaches life and why does he have so many different names?
There is a discrepancy because people have their reasons.
Heru/5500 B.C hamitic Ethiopian
Ptah/Ausar/Auset/ First Dynasty 31000/3000 B.C
Osiris/Greeks/?
Adam/ Christians/?
?
The point is the earliest reference was the Hamitic name and everything else derives from that.
As to Christianity it's essentially flawed (As in the representation, it borrows heavily from the Gospel of Heru but it's flawed)
THE GOSPEL OF HERU (Part 1)
Understand that the Gospel, works, and resurrection of Jesus were all born out of the Gospel of Heru. Therefore, to restore the Gospel of Heru as the Everlasting Gospel written of in Revelation 14:6, it would be best to start with examining Jesus from a totally different perspective than that which was propagated by Europeans. The European perspective of Jesus is that of a white Jew, who came to fulfill the prophecies of just the Hebrew prophets written of in the Old Testament. In our perspective, Jesus is seen as an Ethiopian Hebrew descendant of the Hamitic Ethiopian Heru. He is sent by Heru to not only to fulfill the prophecies of the Hebrew prophets, but also the prophecies and works of all his Ethiopian ancestors, whose prophecies and works were born out of the Gospel of Heru. To develop an understanding Jesus' fulfillment of all faith in God, we will start with the resurrection of Jesus, and perhaps work our way back to the beginning of his Gospel. When we are finished, it should be clear why Jesus would declare, in John 14:1-7, that there are many mansions in his Father's house, and implied that whosoever believed in God also believed in him--no matter what faith they came to him through.
Jesus was not the first son of Heru to be resurrected from the dead. The first son of Heru to be resurrected from the dead was Heru-pa-khart, or Horus the younger, and simply Horus when Heru's name was changed to Osiris (Volume I, Gods of The Egyptians, Budge, page 467). He was murdered by his brother Meru, which is the root of the stories Set kills Horus, and Cain kills Abel. However, before his son's murder, Heru had already written of, in his Gospel, the method of preparing the body for the transformation and for the resurrection. Yet his son was raised from the dead in another form was said to have entered into the Kingdom of Heaven. Whether the resurrection was caused by preparation of the body or the harmony and unity that existed between the Gospel of Heru and the Works of God I can't say. I do know that we can find the preparation of the body for resurrection on pages 131-139 of Volume II of "The Gods of The Egyptians" by Budge. All of which is no doubt a later Egyptian distorted version of what actually happened in Ethiopia somewhere between the Blue Nile and White Nile south of Meroe long before Heru's name was changed to Osiris. The twelve divisions of the Tuat, which represent the divine science in the Gospel of Heru, just might give us a better idea of what actually caused the resurrection. Nevertheless, the resurrection of Heru's son is the root of how Horus became known as the god of the resurrection in Egypt, and Jesus coming to fulfill the resurrection written of in the Gospel of Heru.
The legacy of Horus' (or Abel's) resurrection was also maintained in the Hebrew Scriptures. We can get a vague glimpse of it in the Book of Hebrews.
HEBREWS 11:4
"By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by he being dead yet speaketh."
Jesus was also a physician who worked miracles with medicine and divine science. Let us take a lot at from where he learned such things. During the Third Dynasty, Ptah brought the Gospel of Heru from Meroe or Napata into the Memphis region in the original language of Heru. On page 524 of Volume I of "The Gods of The Egyptians" by Budge, we learn that the Gospel of Heru, in its original language, appeared in the hands of Heru-tata-f. We are told that he was a very learned man and a very skillful writer, whose speech was hard to understand. His speech was hard to understand because he spoke in the original language of Heru, and other descendants of Heru has already introduced his Gospel in the in other Hamitic languages during the First and Second
Dynasties. Some believe that the original language of Heru is closely associated with the Ge'ez of Ethiopia, but only was only written in hieroglyph form instead of the syllabet form of Ge'ez. However, I-em-hetep was there, and was skilled in the original language of Heru as well as some of the other Hamitic languages through the Gospel of Heru had previously been introduced into the region. Through the divine science in the Gospel of Heru, I-em-hetep became the first master physician. And it is from the works of I-em-hetep that Jesus also learned to become a master physician, who could work miracles with medicine and divine science.
I-em-hetep also built the very first pyramid at Saqqarah around 2737-2717. As the first master physician and master architect, I-em-hetep was deified as a member of the Triad of gods at Memphis. In Memphis, the Gospel of Heru according to I-em-hetep began the bases for build the Great Pyramid of Egypt in the Fourth Dynasty.
I-em-hetep's knowledge of the original language of Heru and several of the other languages, in which the Gospel of Heru reached the Memphis area, also became the foundation of the very same Egyptian archives through which Moses would learn to the sons of God (the sons of Heru) which he would later write about in the 4th-6th Chapters of the Book of Genesis as descendants of Adam.
The various ministries of the descendants of Heru were recorded in places like Ethiopia, Meroe, Napata, and Thebes before such records were brought into Memphis by kings of the First, Second, and Third Dynasties. In the Fifth Chapter of Genesis, Moses records (or interprets) the life spans of these ministries as how long the ministers lived. When it was detected that the Gospel of Heru, according to a particular minister, was changed into another language, Moses recorded as the minister having sons and daughters. Therefore, we find these ministers having children at the age of two to three hundred years old. Commonsense should tell us that Moses was not actually recording the biological life span of these descendants of Adam, or that they were actually fathering children at such advanced biological ages.
The ability to determine the exact time the Gospel of Heru began was not the works of I-em-hetep of the Third Dynasty, but rather the works of Meni (or Menes in Greek) of the very First Dynasty. It is through the works of Meni that we are able to understand the prophecy of Christ coming 5500 years after the conception of the Gospel of Heru to redeem is seed (The Forgotten Books of Eden, The First Book of Adam and Eve, Chapter Three, verse six). The First Dynasty no doubt began some where between 3500 B.C and 3000 B.C. On page 76 of "Wonderful Ethiopians of The Ancient Cushite Empire" Drusilla Dunjee Houston tells us that Menes dates back to 5500 B.C. How could such a brilliant researcher have made such an error? It is easy to understand if she doing her research from a copy of Menes on written records, wherein he declares himself to be from the time in which the Gospel of Heru was first conceived. Meni was the actual founder of Memphis, and like the scribed Heru-tata-f, who would come after him, Meni no doubt spoke the original language of Heru. Understand that, during those times, there were no words or expressions like democracy, capitalism, socialism, communism, "give me liberty or give be death," "we hold these truths to be self evident," black power, "I have a dream," etc. to serve as a rally cry that gathers men and women together to undertake various endeavors. To accomplish great achievements, during this time in history, men and women were gathered together by spiritual concept, or a declaration of the Word of God. Declaring the Gospel of Heru to be the Word of God, Meni succeeded in united Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt. Once unified, they became great builders of temples, and dams to harness the power of the Nile, and developed many new cults around the Gospel of Heru, with Memphis as their center. Yet many Egyptologists
might say that no king by the name Meni existed in the First Dynasty or any other Dynasty because his name is not in the List of Kings.
Let us examine why the name Meni may have been omitted from the List of Kings. In declaring himself to be from the time that the Gospel of Heru was actually conceived, Meni set the precedence for what banner-name or ka-name all the kings of the first four Dynasties would bear in their seals, the royal titulary. Their ka-name became known as their Horus-name, a Greek translation that replaces the Egyptian shorten version of Heru-pa-khart. The name implies that all the kings of the first four Dynasties were the resurrected son of Heru.
The oldest known part of the royal titulary is the Horus-name üˆöf§UPAC84 , the banner-name or ka-name. It represents the king as the earthly embodiment of the god Horus, the divine prototype and patron of the Egyptian kings.
The Nebti-name üˆöf§UPAC84 shows the king in a special relation to two goddesses: the vulture-goddess Nekhbet of the Upper Egyptian cities of Elkab and Hierakonpolis and the cobra-goddess Uto of the Lower Egyptian city Buto. Both goddesses are the deified personification of Upper- and Lower-Egypt respectively, and as such, the Nebti-name denotes the king as "the one of Nekhbet (Upper-Egypt) and Uto (Lower-Egypt)", i.e. as the "one belonging to Upper- and Lower-Egypt".
The meaning of the third part of the royal titulary, the "golden Horus name" üˆöf§UPAC84 , is (even) more disputed. Both Kheops (Khufu) of the 4th Dynasty and Merenre of the 6th Dynasty have the title with two falcons over the "gold" sign. These two falcons are frequently used as a symbolic representation of the reconciled gods Horus and Seth.
For future reference, please remember the meaning of two falcons in the golden Horus-name of king Khufu. It will become very important in understanding who actually designed and built the Great Pyramid at Giza.
The nomen is introduced by the epithet üˆöf§UPAC84 "son of Re". It was added to the royal titulary in the beginning of the 4th Dynasty. It was from that time on, that the royal titulary became established in the form discussed here. The name in the cartouche was, as a rule, the king's name of birth.
The problem with identifying Meni was that the oldest known sources that mentioned a king only referred to him using his Horus-name, which, in the case of the king that founded Memphis, was not Meni. However, his name continued to ring out in the ancient world until a form of his name was adopted in the Aramaic language spoken by Daniel.
DANIEL 5:25-26
"And this is the writing that was written, ME'NE, ME'NE, TE'KEL, UPHAR'SIN."
"This is the interpretation of the thing: ME'NE; God hath numbered thy kingdom, and finished it."
Remember that it was the works of Meni that made it possible to count the number of years back that the Gospel of Heru was conceived, and the number of years from the conception of the Gospel of Heru until the coming of Christ.
Author
