Rasta TimesCHAT ROOMArticles/ArchiveRaceAndHistory RootsWomen Trinicenter
Africa Speaks.com Africa Speaks HomepageAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.com
InteractiveLeslie VibesAyanna RootsRas TyehimbaTriniView.comGeneral Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 17, 2024, 11:45:21 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
25912 Posts in 9968 Topics by 982 Members Latest Member: - Ferguson Most online today: 25 (July 03, 2005, 06:25:30 PM)
+  Africa Speaks Reasoning Forum
| |-+  Science and Technology (Moderators: Tyehimba, leslie)
| | |-+  Single-Celled Giant Upends Early Evolution
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Single-Celled Giant Upends Early Evolution  (Read 11128 times)
Iniko Ujaama
Posts: 541

« on: November 21, 2008, 09:45:26 PM »

Single-Celled Giant Upends Early EvolutionMichael Reilly, Discovery News

A distant relative of microscopic amoebas, the grape-sized Gromia sphaerica was discovered once before, lying motionless at the bottom of the Arabian Sea. But when Mikhail Matz of the University of Texas at Austin and a group of researchers stumbled across a group of G. sphaerica off the coast of the Bahamas, the creatures were leaving trails behind them up to 50 centimeters (20 inches) long in the mud.

The trouble is, single-celled critters aren't supposed to be able to leave trails. The oldest fossils of animal trails, called 'trace fossils', date to around 580 million years ago, and paleontologists always figured they must have been made by multicellular animals with complex, symmetrical bodies.

But G. sphaerica's traces are the spitting image of the old, Precambrian fossils; two small ridges line the outside of the trail, and one thin bump runs down the middle.

At up to three centimeters (1.2 inches) in diameter, they're also enormous compared to most of their microscopic cousins.

"If these guys were alive 600 million years ago, and their traces got fossilized, a paleontologist who had never seen this thing would not have a shade of doubt attributing this kind of trace to the activity of a big, multicellular, bilaterally symmetrical animal," Matz said.

"This is a very important discovery," Shuhai Xiao of Virginia Polytechnic Institute said. "The fact that protists can make traces has important implications for how we interpret many trace fossils."

The finding could overturn conventional thinking on a mysterious time in the evolution of early life known as the Cambrian Explosion. Until about 550 million years ago, there were very few animals leaving trails behind. Then, within ten million years an unprecedented blossoming of life swarmed across the planet, filling every niche with hard-bodied, complex creatures.

"It wasn't a gradual development of complexity," Matz said. "Instead these things suddenly seemed to burst out of a magic box."

Charles Darwin first noticed the Cambrian Explosion and thought it was an artifact of a poorly preserved fossil record. The precambrian trace fossils were left by multicellular animals, he reasoned, so there must be some gap in fossils between the nearly empty Precambrian and the teeming world that quickly followed. But if the first traces were instead made by G. sphaerica, it would mean the Explosion was real; it must have been a diversification of life on a scale never before seen.

Genetic analysis of the water-filled G. sphaerica cells also reveals tantalizing clues that it could be the oldest living fossil on the planet.

"There's a 1.8 billion-year-old fossil in the Stirling formation in Australia that looks just like one of their traces, and with a discoidal body impression similar to these guys." Matz said. "We haven't proved anything, but we might be looking at the ultimate living macroscopic fossil."


Junior Member
Posts: 101

« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2009, 12:09:29 AM »

the theory of evolution proposed by Darwin will have to be modified.  Curious that it has not been for all these years and has become a sort of orthodox religion of itself.  Life evolves in some ways but there is much evidence that life also transforms without gradual evolution ("punctuated evolution") as is suggested by this article.  Furthermore, the strong and best adapted do not always survive, the theory of extinction is dubious as Darwin saw it and evolutionary  biology  traditionally does not account for the extremely variable planet and solar system we inhabit, based instead on false assumption of a "steady state" of equilibrium that does not exist

Some say that DNA itself is not in fact a storehouse for all patterns of life on this planet.  It has been postulated that the DNA molecule is in fact a receiver that tunes into unversal aether-like information circuit connected to plasma and dynamic properties of electricity little understood.  Within this interstellar if not intergalactic environment exists the sum total of information for all life .  Such a view opens up many interesting searches and reasonings compared to what we actually observe here on earth.  The evolutionary biologists and microbiologists have had to come up with a theory of "punctuated evolution" to describe the sudden transformation of life, but obviously this is a weak idea that seems to be desperate to include the world "evolution" where transformation would be more appropriate, since evolution cannot by normal aspects of its definition be "punctuated". Probably the truth lies somewhere in between as usual. N8
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Copyright © 2001-2005 AfricaSpeaks.com and RastafariSpeaks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!