Honour

"Many years ago, a group of Negro-Australoid people were found in Northern Japan. They look exactly like Australian Aborigines and Black Africans. However, it seems that sometime between the 1700's to the early 1900's that group became bleached with Caucasian and Mongol. Today, many look like Caucasians. The same thing is happening today in Australia and it also happened in Tasmania, where the original Tasmanians were Negroid/Black people with kinky hair. Today, they are all Caucasoid in appearance."

What is clearly seen from what you said is that these people did not become caucasoid as an act of 'evolution'. That what changed thier physical attributes was INTER-BREEDING. The very same thing that has changed people's appearance OVER ALL the ages.

There was never a specie of pale skinned man indigenous to any part of Africa. The earliest records kept by Africans speak of such people coming up from the lower (and thus colder) regions of the Earth.

There are, among present day caucasians, ones who are red-headed. These are said to be the closest in genetic terms to the neanderthals. As you said, every human physical feature known on Earth (from the epicanthic fold to the straightened hair) is present among indigenous African peoples. There are variations within a general framework, but what is common remains the same. There has never been anything said to show how the red-head is of a different 'race' from other caucasians, therefore, if the red-head is part-neanderthal, all caucasians are part neanderthal.

Black peoples were once spread across much of the habitable upper regions of the Earth (the regions closest to the Sun). Is it not possible that these peoples interbred with ones emerging from behind the ice barriers and that by so doing they gave birth to what is now known as the many 'races' of man?

There is, as I believe you know, also another hypothesis concerning the origins of the human species. One that is based on the fact that there is no INCONTROVERTIBLE proof that all of humanity stepped out of one solitary hole. Nothing to say that other sets of Black peoples did not emerge autonomously in Asia or even Australia.

And if you look at how nature works, you will see that things are created in a way that permits them to best adapt to the environment they were created in. In regions where the Sun is all-powerful, it can be expected that the beings made for those regions would be ones whose attributes provided the best protection.

Now, there is nothing to suggest that the neanderthal did not itself emerge autonomously from the regions where the Sun was less dominant. After all, trees cover the Earth, trees have much in common but does that mean all trees were grown from the one same seed? Likewise, there are fish that are found only in rivers. How did they get there? Did the oceans reverse and wash them up?

It is said that Black people wandered from Africa into what became known as europe, this may be true. It is then said that the caucasian is a DIRECT descendant of these Africans. That the caucasian is an African who became trapped behind ice barriers and then lost his melanin. Well, how long did it take those ice barriers to form? How stupid were these Africans that they did not know to climb out of the hole they were in? Were they lost?

We are now witnessing changes in climate and from what we are seeing, we can deduce how long the kind of changes that turned what were once temperate regions into iced up regions to occur. This kind of drastic change must have happenned at the very least over a few centuries. Why did these Africans not find more suitable habitation? Were they lost or were they just stupid? Or did they have valuable material objects that they were unwilling to leave behind? Great cities that they could not bring themselves to abandon?

No. These early people were part (or wholly) nomadic. To wander in search of better surroundings would have been thier natural impulse. The only reason beings would have stayed in a cold world was because that was the world they were best adapted to. Because, that was the world they were created into.

The conservative estimates claim that the 'ice age' lasted for several tens of thousands of years. Time enough for another species to emerge. The idea that Africans became trapped behind ice can only hold if we assign certain mental faculties to those Africans. Ancient humans knew more about reading nature than we do now, and to think they would'nt have realised what was happenning and made thier way back towards more SUITABLE environments does not make sense.

There is no 'science' here really, all that is being done is speculation. And as is normal, people will present thier speculation to fit thier own agendas. Well, we all have agendas and mine will not permit me to accept someone else's speculation as fact.

And I am still waiting to hear why it will be to any African's benefit to accept this 'out of Africa' theory as GOSPEL, why there is so much FAITH placed in the truth this thing by people who have never tested with thier own hands and minds what they defend with such determination.