| Homepage | Howcomyoucom | RaceandHistory | RootsWomen | Trinicenter |
 |
 |
 |
| ARCHIVE HOME | MESSAGE BOARD | REASONING FORUM | ARTICLES | NEWS WEBLOG |
|
For a seeking of truthfulness, are you ready to entertain the possibility that what is considered "divinely inspired" in the Old Testament or Tanakh is actually as you said, "received", copied, or overheard knowledge from the Egyptians/Kemetians?
And if you are ready to accept that possibility, then still it can be considered "divinely inspired" (just not as presented) because Afrikans were/are 'divine beings'.
In other words, its a word play on semantics that conveniently falls shy of acknowledging Black divinity, originality and spirituality.
Let me know your thoughts on this.
Anyone?
 FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |