Rasta TimesCHAT ROOMArticles/ArchiveRaceAndHistory RootsWomen Trinicenter
Africa Speaks.com Africa Speaks HomepageAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.com
InteractiveLeslie VibesAyanna RootsRas TyehimbaTriniView.comGeneral Forums
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 04, 2024, 03:41:49 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
25910 Posts in 9966 Topics by 982 Members Latest Member: - Ferguson Most online today: 398 (July 03, 2005, 06:25:30 PM)
+  Africa Speaks Reasoning Forum
|-+  WORLD HOT SPOTS
| |-+  Around the World (Moderators: Tyehimba, leslie)
| | |-+  Dumped in Africa: Britain’s toxic waste
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Dumped in Africa: Britain’s toxic waste  (Read 14092 times)
Tyehimba
Moderator
*****
Posts: 1788

RastafariSpeaks


WWW
« on: February 19, 2009, 11:05:22 AM »

Dumped in Africa: Britain’s toxic waste

Children exposed to poisonous material in defiance of UK law

By Cahal Milmo

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

Tonnes of toxic waste collected from British municipal dumps is being sent illegally to Africa in flagrant breach of this country’s obligation to ensure its rapidly growing mountain of defunct televisions, computers and gadgets are disposed of safely.

Hundreds of thousands of discarded items, which under British law must be dismantled or recycled by specialist contractors, are being packaged into cargo containers and shipped to countries such as Nigeria and Ghana, where they are stripped of their raw metals by young men and children working on poisoned waste dumps.

In a joint investigation by The Independent, Sky News, and Greenpeace, a television that had been broken beyond repair was tracked to an electronics market in Lagos, Nigeria, after being left at a civic amenity site in Basingstoke run by Hampshire Country Council. Under environmental protection laws It was classified as hazardous waste and should never have left the UK.

The television, fitted with a satellite tracking device, was bought by a London-based dealer, one of dozens of operators buying up a significant proportion of the estimated 940,000 tonnes of domestic electronic waste, or e-waste, produced in the UK each year and sending it for export.

Investigators bought back the television after a 4,500-mile journey from Tilbury Docks in Essex to the giant Alaba electronics market in Lagos, where up to 15 shipping containers of discarded electronics from Europe and Asia arrive every day. At least a third of the contents of each container is broken beyond use and transferred to dumps where waste pickers scavenge amid a cocktail of burning heavy metals and dioxins. The television is just one example of a broader problem with the enforcement of the legislation, which permits the export of functioning equipment but prohibits broken electronic goods from being sent outside the EU to a country with a developing economy.

Such is the confused state of the recycling industry, with some local authorities collating figures on the amount of waste being exported and others simply handing the task to sub-contractors, that the e-waste body representing the electronics industry admits abuse is widespread.

Claire Snow, the director of the Industry Council for Equipment Recycling (ICER), told The Independent: “It is clear that the system for collecting equipment which UK householders have thrown away is not working as well as it should.

“On the pretext of re-use, equipment which is clearly not suitable for any type of re-use is effectively being dumped in developing countries.”

Government figures show that 450,000 tonnes of e-waste is currently being treated in accordance with Britain’s waste electronic and electrical equipment laws, which place a responsibility on manufacturers to meet the environmental cost. But with the average Briton throwing away four pieces of e-waste every year, approximately 500,000 tonnes is going unaccounted for. Industry research seen by The Independent estimates that at least 10,000 tonnes of waste televisions and 23,000 tonnes of computers classified as hazardous waste are being illegally exported as part of a wider e-waste market worth “tens of millions of pounds”.

Campaigners say dealers offering around £3 for a television and £1 for a computer monitor to waste sites are undercutting specialist recycling companies, creating a “grey market”.

Britain is responsible for around 15 per cent of the EU’s total e-waste, which is growing three times faster than any other muncipal waste stream.

Martin Hojsik, toxics campaigner for Greenpeace International, said: "Companies can stop this illegal toxic trade now by ensuring their goods are free from hazardous components. It is critical they and governments take full responsibility for the safe recycling of their products and put an end to the growing e-waste dumps that are poisoning people."

Bosses at Hampshire County Council last night launched an inquiry into its waste sites but insisted it and its household waste site contractor, Hopkins Recycling, only used dealers who exported functional equipment.

A spokesman for Consumers International, which is campaigning for tightened e-waste controls, said: “The sight of children scavenging toxic wastelands overflowing with the West’s unwanted computers and televisions makes a mockery of international bans to prevent the dumping of e-waste. Western governments, including the UK, have shown little desire to deal with the root cause of this problem.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/dumped-in-africa-britain8217s-toxic-waste-1624869.html
Logged
nomo8
Junior Member
**
Posts: 101


« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2009, 05:28:55 PM »

the AU should buy up a few mothballed super tankers riding at anchor , fit only for a one way voyage, have a continental campaign to as safely as possible load them up with as much hazardous waste from europe as they can realistically scavenge from the sites most problematical to human health, buy just enough bunker fuel for a one way voyage and have skeleton crews sail toward Britain at flank speed - ground em and leave em.

 Of course, there are the various navies that would stop it, the same navies patrolling for Somali pirates, pirates who came into existence partly due to the illegal fishing and dumping of toxic waste off their coast by the countries which claim these various navies as their own.

Trajic and absurd.  N8
Logged
afrikanrebel06
Full Member
***
Posts: 316


« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2009, 04:18:50 AM »

 Angry come on dont so freaking knaive, the AU IS  DEFUNCT BODY, AN UNEXISTING ENTITY WHO CAN NOT STAND AGAINST A MAMMOTH LIKE EUROPE AND ROMERIKKKA MAN, GET REAL AND SMELL THE REEL COLOMBIAN COFFEE AND STOP SMOKING DEM HERBS SO U CAN THINK CLEAR bro! Roll Eyes
Logged
gman
Full Member
***
Posts: 417

AfricaSpeaks


« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2009, 12:38:34 PM »

Afrikanrebel, learn to recognise sarcasm when you see it. No idea whether or not nomo8 uses herb (as I do, and I don't feel that I'm particularly foggy-brained because of it), but it was obvious to me that he or she was being sarcastic.
Logged
siger
Junior Member
**
Posts: 142


« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2009, 08:58:45 AM »

I hear you Nomo8.

Here is an interesting post i found:

Who imagined that in 2009, the world's governments
would be declaring a new War on Pirates? As you read
this, the British Royal Navy - backed by the ships of
more than two dozen nations, from the US to China - is
sailing into Somalian waters to take on men we still
picture as parrot-on-the-shoulder pantomime villains.
They will soon be fighting Somalian ships and even
chasing the pirates onto land, into one of the most
broken countries on earth. But behind the
arrr-me-hearties oddness of this tale, there is an
untold scandal. The people our governments are
labelling as "one of the great menaces of our times"
have an extraordinary story to tell - and some justice
on their side.

Pirates have never been quite who we think they are. In
the "golden age of piracy" - from 1650 to 1730 - the
idea of the pirate as the senseless, savage Bluebeard
that lingers today was created by the British
government in a great propaganda heave. Many ordinary
people believed it was false: pirates were often saved
from the gallows by supportive crowds. Why? What did
they see that we can't? In his book Villains Of All
Nations, the historian Marcus Rediker pores through the
evidence.

If you became a merchant or navy sailor then - plucked
from the docks of London's East End, young and hungry -
you ended up in a floating wooden Hell. You worked all
hours on a cramped, half-starved ship, and if you
slacked off, the all-powerful captain would whip you
with the Cat O' Nine Tails. If you slacked often, you
could be thrown overboard. And at the end of months or
years of this, you were often cheated of your wages.

Pirates were the first people to rebel against this
world. They mutinied - and created a different way of
working on the seas. Once they had a ship, the pirates
elected their captains, and made all their decisions
collectively, without torture. They shared their bounty
out in what Rediker calls "one of the most egalitarian
plans for the disposition of resources to be found
anywhere in the eighteenth century".

They even took in escaped African slaves and lived with
them as equals. The pirates showed "quite clearly - and
subversively - that ships did not have to be run in the
brutal and oppressive ways of the merchant service and
the Royal Navy." This is why they were romantic heroes,
despite being unproductive thieves.

The words of one pirate from that lost age, a young
British man called William Scott, should echo into this
new age of piracy. Just before he was hanged in
Charleston, South Carolina, he said: "What I did was to
keep me from perishing. I was forced to go a-pirateing
to live." In 1991, the government of Somalia collapsed.
Its nine million people have been teetering on
starvation ever since - and the ugliest forces in the
Western world have seen this as a great opportunity to
steal the country's food supply and dump our nuclear
waste in their seas.

Yes: nuclear waste. As soon as the government was gone,
mysterious European ships started appearing off the
coast of Somalia, dumping vast barrels into the ocean.
The coastal population began to sicken. At first they
suffered strange rashes, nausea and malformed babies.
Then, after the 2005 tsunami, hundreds of the dumped
and leaking barrels washed up on shore. People began to
suffer from radiation sickness, and more than 300 died.

Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the UN envoy to Somalia, tells
me: "Somebody is dumping nuclear material here. There
is also lead, and heavy metals such as cadmium and
mercury - you name it." Much of it can be traced back
to European hospitals and factories, who seem to be
passing it on to the Italian mafia to "dispose" of
cheaply. When I asked Mr Ould-Abdallah what European
governments were doing about it, he said with a sigh:
"Nothing. There has been no clean-up, no compensation,
and no prevention."

At the same time, other European ships have been
looting Somalia's seas of their greatest resource:
seafood. We have destroyed our own fish stocks by
overexploitation - and now we have moved on to theirs.
More than $300m-worth of tuna, shrimp, and lobster are
being stolen every year by illegal trawlers. The local
fishermen are now starving. Mohammed Hussein, a
fisherman in the town of Marka 100km south of
Mogadishu, told Reuters: "If nothing is done, there
soon won't be much fish left in our coastal waters."

This is the context in which the "pirates" have
emerged. Somalian fishermen took speedboats to try to
dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least levy a
"tax" on them. They call themselves the Volunteer
Coastguard of Somalia - and ordinary Somalis agree. The
independent Somalian news site WardheerNews found 70
per cent "strongly supported the piracy as a form of
national defence".

No, this doesn't make hostage-taking justifiable, and
yes, some are clearly just gangsters - especially those
who have held up World Food Programme supplies. But in
a telephone interview, one of the pirate leaders,
Sugule Ali: "We don't consider ourselves sea bandits.
We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally
fish and dump in our seas." William Scott would
understand.

Did we expect starving Somalians to stand passively on
their beaches, paddling in our toxic waste, and watch
us snatch their fish to eat in restaurants in London
and Paris and Rome? We won't act on those crimes - the
only sane solution to this problem - but when some of
the fishermen responded by disrupting the
transit-corridor for 20 per cent of the world's oil
supply, we swiftly send in the gunboats.

The story of the 2009 war on piracy was best summarised
by another pirate, who lived and died in the fourth
century BC. He was captured and brought to Alexander
the Great, who demanded to know "what he meant by
keeping possession of the sea." The pirate smiled, and
responded: "What you mean by seizing the whole earth;
but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a
robber, while you, who do it with a great fleet, are
called emperor." Once again, our great imperial fleets
sail - but who is the robber?

_____________________________________________

Portside aims to provide material of interest
to people on the left that will help them to
interpret the world and to change it.


http://www.indepenent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-you-are-being-lied-to-about-pirates-1225817.htm
Logged

We look neither left nor right, but forward.
nomo8
Junior Member
**
Posts: 101


« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2009, 10:43:15 PM »

All the replies to my response are essentially valid and fair, yes it was  satire.  It would be a little premature, perhaps, to romanticize these pirates in somalia, regardless of their origins .  The history of piracy and of maritime trade in general doesn't lend itself too well to good guy bad guy theory.  Let's just say there are buckets of blood to go around and around aplenty. The somali pirates actually practice some pretty clever tactics and abide by unwritten rules and regulations for piracy (ransom pay offs, ship sails on its way).  Pirates of the carribbean, now there's some gawd awful stuff - dead men tell no tales and worse. Good article though...

I think what the real concern is among the western and eastern powers is the establishment of some kind of Somali tarriff based on past damages (a very expensive precedent when extended to all the other somalias) and future control of the sea lanes coastwise to the horn of africa.  It's better of course to have a do anything you want sea lane and dumping ground.  Such a tarrif would support the establishment of a somali navy or coast guard comprised of the existing pirate clans.  the industrialists and the ship owners probably will push for pay offs (its cheaper) and "normal" continuation of trade.  I think that is what the somali pirates are probably holding out for, a legitimate (to them) coastal patrol capable of enforcing transit fees which are usually anethma to international shipping and commerce.  However, under the unique conditions historically and in the present in the region, perhaps the former colonial powers would be best served, even considering only rank greed, with accomadating the somalis, who like the Afghanis, are very, very determined and hard to defeat in any prolonged military confrontation.

There have been some essays written that suggest that somali pirates are foreign financed with alterior motives, I guess anything is possible and no doubt the situation is complex, it always is if you want to fight back against a technologically and numerically superior opponent.



Someone has a lot of time on their hands to read lots of old posts here and find some means of casting aspersions on a person's character.  To one responder: you don't need to fall for any internet trap by revealing personal information about yourself that hasn't much place here .The internet is a search and destroy device as well as a too much time on your hands forum. .....N8
Logged
SimeonLevi
Newbie
*
Posts: 19


« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2009, 08:46:33 AM »

I was not aware of this

fundamental issue for all and specifically British ppl

I will look further

with thanks for your time
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Copyright © 2001-2005 AfricaSpeaks.com and RastafariSpeaks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!