Rasta TimesCHAT ROOMArticles/ArchiveRaceAndHistory RootsWomen Trinicenter
Africa Speaks.com Africa Speaks HomepageAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.com
InteractiveLeslie VibesAyanna RootsRas TyehimbaTriniView.comGeneral Forums
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 14, 2024, 01:13:52 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
25912 Posts in 9968 Topics by 982 Members Latest Member: - Ferguson Most online today: 282 (July 03, 2005, 06:25:30 PM)
+  Africa Speaks Reasoning Forum
|-+  WORLD HOT SPOTS
| |-+  Around the World (Moderators: Tyehimba, leslie)
| | |-+  Bush clears Saddam of 9/11 attacks
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Bush clears Saddam of 9/11 attacks  (Read 10524 times)
Ayinde
Ayinde
*
Posts: 1531


WWW
« on: September 17, 2003, 05:26:46 PM »

George Bush says there is no evidence Saddam Hussein was involved in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

His statement disputes an idea held by many Americans.

President Bush said: "There's no question that Saddam Hussein had al Qaida ties."

But he added: "We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11 attacks."

A new poll in the US found nearly 70% of respondents believed the Iraqi leader probably was personally involved.

The US administration has argued that Saddam's government had close links to al Qaida, the terrorist network led by Osama bin Laden that masterminded the September 11 attacks.

© Associated Press


Story filed: 22:26 Wednesday 17th September 2003

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_820363.html

MORE...
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0314/p02s01-woiq.html
Logged
Ayinde
Ayinde
*
Posts: 1531


WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2003, 10:14:54 PM »

ABSTRACT:
By Derrick Z. Jackson, 9/17/2003


On "Meet the Press" last Sunday, Cheney claimed that the White House has "learned more and more that there was a relationship" between Iraq and Al Qaeda, the terrorist network responsible for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. One of his pieces of "evidence" was the old report of a meeting in Prague in early 2001 between Mohamed Atta, one of the Sept. 11 airplane hijackers, and what Cheney described as "a senior Iraqi intelligence official."

The Czech government began backing away from the claim almost as soon as it was made. American and British intelligence agencies never found any hard evidence of a meeting. The claim became a dubious if not a dead issue in intelligence circles more than a year ago. The more likely possibility, according to intelligence records, was that Atta was in Virginia Beach, casing naval facilities.

Yet Cheney on his own brought it back up Sunday as if the meeting remains a real possibility, with an investigation still in progress. "With respect to 9/11, of course, we've had the story that's been public out there. The Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack. But we've never been able to develop any more of that yet either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it. We just don't know."

Cheney also made the claim that Al Qaeda "sent personnel to Baghdad to get trained" on biological and chemical weapons and bomb making. No such training sessions have ever been confirmed. Cheney offered no new evidence to substantiate his claim. The Globe, in a story yesterday, quoted a senior defense official as saying, "There isn't any new intelligence."

Cheney's claim that we have learned more when we have learned nothing more is one more lie in the chain of deception that convinced a critical number of Americans to support the invasion and occupation of Iraq -- at the loss of nearly 300 American soldiers and thousands of Iraqi soldiers and civilians. The fact that he dredged up the thinnest of alleged links between Iraq and Al Qaeda shocked his own intelligence officials. The fact that his own senior defense officials say there is no new intelligence is a dead giveaway that there never was a justification for this invasion.

It is fitting that Cheney is the man showing the White House's empty hand. It was he who said during the buildup:

"We now know that Saddam has resumed his efforts to acquire nuclear weapons."

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction."

"We know he's reconstituted these programs since the Gulf War."

"We know that he has a long-standing relationship with various terrorist groups, including the Al Qaeda organization."

"We believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons."

The string of claims has finally reached the point where the media are challenging dear old granddad. On Sunday's "Meet the Press," NBC's Tim Russert replayed the quote about Saddam currently having reconstituted nuclear weapons. Russert said to Cheney, "You misspoke."

Cheney responded, "Yeah, I did misspeak. I said repeatedly during the show `weapons capability.' We never had any evidence that he had acquired a nuclear weapon."

Misspeak? In March, Russert asked Cheney, "What do you think is the most important rationale for going to war with Iraq?" Cheney responded, "Well, I think I've just given it, Tim, in terms of the combination of his development and use of chemical weapons, his development of biological weapons, his pursuit of nuclear weapons."

With no proof that Saddam had any of those weapons at the time of the invasion, Cheney's claim that he misspoke becomes yet another lie. Cheney once wowed the Washington elite with his gravitas. With so many soldiers and civilians dead, his gravitas now leads to the grave.

Derrick Z. Jackson's e-mail address is jackson@globe.com.

© Copyright 2003 Globe Newspaper Company.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/
oped/articles/2003/09/17/cheneys_misspeaking_streak/
Logged
Ayinde
Ayinde
*
Posts: 1531


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2003, 10:14:38 PM »

What th...? So now he tells us: Bush admits no Iraqi link to Sept. 11

Backs away from Cheney remarks, public perception


By Bob Kemper, Chicago Tribune

WASHINGTON -- President Bush declared Wednesday that he has no evidence linking Iraq to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, contradicting comments made by Vice President Dick Cheney last weekend and an impression held by a solid majority of Americans.

"We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with Sept. 11," Bush said, definitively knocking down a link that Bush's critics charge he and his administration have intimated and benefited from in prosecuting the war on Iraq.

But Bush, whose speeches have for months regularly referred to the Sept. 11 attacks and the war in Iraq as key elements of a broader war on terrorism, added, "There's no question that Saddam Hussein had Al Qaeda ties."

In a measure of White House concern over the prospect of another challenge to the administration's case against Iraq, Bush sought to defuse the controversy a day after Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice rejected Cheney's suggestions of an Iraqi role in the attacks.

When asked on NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday about a poll showing that 70 percent of Americans believe Iraq was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, Cheney said, "I think it's not surprising that people make that connection."

He said, "We don't know" if such a link exists. But Cheney referred to Iraq as "the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault for many years, but most especially on 9/11."

As possible proof of a connection, the vice president cited an alleged meeting between Mohamed Atta, the Al Qaeda leader of the Sept. 11 strikes, and Iraqi officials in the Czech Republic before the attacks.

"We've never been able to develop any more on that yet, either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it," Cheney said.

But Czech officials disputed that story in December 2001 and intelligence officials have said that Atta was actually in the U.S. at the time of the alleged meeting.

Bush offered a modest defense of Cheney on Wednesday while speaking to reporters at the White House, saying the vice president intended only to link Iraq to Al Qaeda, not the attacks. The president said such a link was evident when Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, an Al Qaeda operative, sought sanctuary in Iraq and learned there how to work with biological and chemical weapons.

The flap over Cheney's comments comes when the White House is already on the defensive over accusations--by critics, members of Congress and Democratic presidential contenders--that Bush and his top aides exaggerated the threat Hussein posed to the United States to justify the invasion of Iraq.

Popularity drops

The U.S. failure to find any evidence of weapons of mass destruction, the chief justification for the invasion, has undercut public support for the president's postwar strategy in Iraq and his popularity overall. Recent public opinion polls show Bush's popularity dipping to pre-Sept. 11 levels.

Against that backdrop, White House officials were eager to shoot down any new threats to Bush's credibility or the administration's case in Iraq.

"We never made that connection," White House spokesman Scott McClellan responded repeatedly to a barrage of questions from reporters Wednesday about Cheney's comments and whether the White House thought Bush benefited from the public misperception of Iraq's involvement.

Rumsfeld, when asked Tuesday about the link between Iraq and the Sept. 11 attacks, said, "I've not seen any indication that would lead me to believe that I could say that."

Rice, appearing on ABC's "Nightline" Tuesday night, added, "We have never claimed that Saddam Hussein had either direction or control of 9/11."

The White House has never definitively declared a link between Iraq and Sept. 11. But Bush and other top administration officials have repeatedly suggested a loose connection between the two, saying that because of Sept. 11 the U.S. had to take a more aggressive approach against groups or nations, like Iraq, that pose a potential threat to its security.

Bush now refers to Iraq as the "central front" in the war on terrorism that he launched immediately after the Sept. 11 attacks In making his case for an invasion of Iraq in a nationally televised address last October, Bush said, "We know Iraq and the Al Qaeda terrorist network share a common enemy: The United States of America." Bush said Hussein had been linked to Al Qaeda for a decade, and added that an "alliance with terrorists could allow the Iraqi regime to attack America without leaving any fingerprints."

'Ally of Al Qaeda'

On May 1, in a speech from the deck of an aircraft carrier in which he declared an end to major combat in Iraq, Bush said, "The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on Sept. 11, 2001--and still goes on."

He added that the war in Iraq "removed an ally of Al Qaeda."

"With those attacks" on Sept. 11, Bush said, "the terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States. And war is what they got."

McClellan said the president did not intend to suggest that Iraq was connected to the Sept. 11 attacks. Rather, McClellan said, Bush was underscoring the relationship between Sept. 11 and the United States' new policy of confronting potential threats before attacks occur.

"One of the most dangerous new threats we face in the post-Sept. 11 world is the nexus between outlaw regimes with weapons of mass destruction and terrorists," McClellan said.

Copyright © 2003, Chicago Tribune

Reprinted from The Chicago Tribune:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0309180313sep18,1,6562708.story
Logged
Bantu_Kelani
Service Member
*****
Posts: 2063


WWW
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2003, 07:25:14 AM »

Keep informing Ayinde!

Yep! Rummy is also distancing himself from their recent comments connecting Saddam with 9/11 uhmm... And when we know  Donald Rumsfeld made MORE money from Halliburton last year than from his salary as VP. I think he's going to be falling on his sword  in the not-too-distant future if there is any justice in this world...

Dumbsfailed, Tush, Chaingangy, Woefulwitz fall from 'grace' will begin a DOMINO effect that will rip a lot of criminal SCUM from power... Xian God have mercy!

Bantu-Kelani.
Logged

We should first show solidarity with each other. We are Africans. We are black. Our first priority is ourselves.
Bantu_Kelani
Service Member
*****
Posts: 2063


WWW
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2003, 07:31:32 AM »

Rumsfeld Sees No Link Between Iraq, 9/11 Huh 2 Annoyed

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=540&ncid=736&e=1&u=/ap/20030916/ap_on_re_mi_ea/rumsfeld_iraq

Quote
WASHINGTON - Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Tuesday he had no reason to believe that Iraq's Saddam Hussein had a hand in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.

At a Pentagon news conference, Rumsfeld was asked about a poll that indicated nearly 70 percent of respondents believed the Iraqi leader probably was personally involved.

"I've not seen any indication that would lead me to believe that I could say that," Rumsfeld said.



Inspections worked! There are no weapons of mass destruction!!

B.K
Logged

We should first show solidarity with each other. We are Africans. We are black. Our first priority is ourselves.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Copyright © 2001-2005 AfricaSpeaks.com and RastafariSpeaks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!