Rasta TimesCHAT ROOMArticles/ArchiveRaceAndHistory RootsWomen Trinicenter
Africa Speaks.com Africa Speaks HomepageAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.com
InteractiveLeslie VibesAyanna RootsRas TyehimbaTriniView.comGeneral Forums
*
Home
Help
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 06, 2024, 04:22:23 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
25910 Posts in 9966 Topics by 982 Members Latest Member: - Ferguson Most online today: 432 (July 03, 2005, 06:25:30 PM)
+  Africa Speaks Reasoning Forum
|-+  GENERAL
| |-+  GENERAL FORUM (Moderators: Tyehimba, leslie, Makini, Zaynab)
| | |-+  Blacks protest Bush's MLK photo-op
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Blacks protest Bush's MLK photo-op  (Read 7703 times)
Ayinde
Ayinde
*
Posts: 1531


WWW
« on: January 18, 2004, 07:16:43 PM »

By BILL MAXWELL, Times Staff Writer
Published January 18, 2004
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/01/18/Columns/Behind_the_Bush_prote.shtml

Many white Americans have dismissed black demonstrations against President Bush's wreath-laying trek to Martin Luther King's grave site in Atlanta as nonsense and an insult to the nation's leader.

Approximately 700 protesters converged on the site, and Bush was met with drumbeats, angry chants and placards with slogans such as "War is not the answer," "Peace, not war," "Bush go home," and "It's not a photo-op, George."

Let me say right off that the protests against Bush were as American as any that have come before or will come afterward.

To dismiss the substantive and symbolic meaning of the demonstrations is to do what Bush and other Republicans like him have always done: discount or ignore the general plight of African-Americans and the issues that are important to them. Or, even worse, consistently oppose legislation that blacks see as benefiting them.

To many blacks, the president does all of the above.

Protesters, therefore, consider him their enemy. Even the president's appointments of two blacks to the Cabinet and the promise of "compassionate conservatism" do not soften opinions. And remember, during the disputed 2000 election, only about 8 percent of blacks voted for Bush.

Many blacks believe that the president, even with the unshakable support of Southern white conservatives, is keeping an eye on the disgruntled black vote in Dixie. Thus, the Atlanta junket.

When African-American issues and emotions are involved, separating substance from symbol is a dicey endeavor. The near-sacred presence of King, especially during the celebrations of his birthday, is something that white leaders, especially the president of the United States, should be keenly aware of. Nothing about the King phenomenon should be taken for granted. Nothing about it should be treated cynically.

The protesters, along with millions of other African-Americans elsewhere, believe that Bush's visit was disrespectful, opportunistic and cynical, mainly because his behavior and policies are antithetical to the essence of King's life and work.

Shortly before his death, for example, King had begun speaking out against the war in Vietnam and military violence elsewhere abroad. He believed that war should be used as a last resort, that negotiation is one of the traits that separates the civilized from the uncivilized. In this light, polls suggest that fewer blacks than whites support the war in Iraq. And more blacks than whites believe that American lives are being wasted in a war that was unnecessary from the start.

King was a man of tolerance and peace. He won the Nobel Peace Prize. Coretta Scott King, the slain civil right leader's widow, accompanied Bush during the wreath ceremony. Although she vehemently opposed the Iraq war, Mrs. King did not comment on it for reporters following the president's visit.

On the domestic issues, anger over the visit is stronger. Sheriee Bowman, a spokeswoman for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the civil rights organization that King co-founded and led until his murder, said, "We question the integrity of the timing of (Bush's) move because last year at this time, he stood . . . against affirmative action, the Michigan case, which is part of Dr. King's legacy."

Even though most whites may be opposed to affirmative action policies, most blacks are not. Many blacks see Bush - a university legacy and one who has dubious business acumen - as the supreme hypocrite on matters related to meritocracy.

Aside from the black church, where clergymen are eager to use federal dollars to run their social programs, black leaders believe that the president dismisses them. They do not enjoy the open door of Jewish, Hispanic and other groups. Black elected officials feel especially dissed.

Rep. Elijah Cummings, chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, argues that few of Bush's policies, in any area, reflect the spirit of King's legacy and dream for America. "The president needs to be more embracing of elected African-American officials and the entire African-American community every day of the year, not just on January 15th," Cummings said.

The Black Caucus is still trying to get the president to meet with them to discuss issues that are important to African-Americans.

SCLC's Bowman and other black leaders say that Bush's visit to Atlanta showed how disconnected he is from the concerns of King and black America. "Dr. King had a philosophy and left a message," she said. "We urge the president to take a look at Dr. King's message and to create policies that mirror that message."

Bowman's observations explain part of why blacks protested Bush's Atlanta visit. During this election season, we can expect to see other such protests against Bush.
Logged
Ayinde
Ayinde
*
Posts: 1531


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2004, 08:52:06 PM »

By Rootsie
January 19, 2004

Every school in the United States has its obligatory Martin Luther King Day 'celebration.' It is interesting to ask students what they know about Dr. King:

"He got freedom for black people."
"He believed the races should get together."
"He believed in love."
"He got assassinated by a racist guy."
"He had a dream."

Once the little ones are finished decorating their papers with butterflies, rainbows, and flowers, perhaps it's time to ask, as I did:

"Did you know he was beaten and arrested many times?"
"No."
"Did you know his house was firebombed?"
"No."
"Did you know he knew he was going to be killed for the work he did?"
"No."
"Did you know he spoke out against the Vietnam war, and was assassinated shortly after?"
"No."
"Well what kind of man do these things say he was?"
"Brave."
"And who did all these things to him?"
"White people."
"From where?"
"The United States."
"Are those people gone now?"
"Well they don't do those things anymore."
"Well they killed him, didn't they? Don't you think they would feel pretty good about that?"
"Well yes."
"So are they gone now? Where did they go?"

At this point there would be many places to take such a conversation, from atrocities like Richard Byrd or the MOVE massacre, to government complicity in his harassment and assassination, to the lived reality of racism today in the United States.

But Dr. King has been colonized, co-opted as some sort of poster child for America's illusion of racial harmony. I remember how white people in the North feared Malcolm X and loved Dr. King; they ignored his militancy and embraced him as a 'good black.' He knew he would be silenced, and by whom. He knew that the moment Malcolm X spoke out on the international stage, he was quickly murdered. And yet Dr. King persisted.

But we don't want to talk about revolutionary spirit. We want our children indoctrinated into the idea that 'democratic processes' work, that if someone has a problem they must simply speak out and the government will write a new law to help them out. The assassination of Dr. King is viewed as anomalous to his work, and not as the inevitable result of it. In the North especially, people could shake their heads and cluck sadly about those 'Southern crackers.'

'Freedom fighter."
"Revolutionary."
"Radical."

None of these are used to describe Dr. King, and they would not be appropriate to describe the whitewashed version of him that has been constructed over the past 35 years. On this day, Americans are not encouraged to take a cool look at their history, and they are certainly not invited to reflect on what has become of Dr. King's 'dream.' Their president appointed a racist judge to a Federal bench while a filibustering Congress was out of town, and last year to celebrate he announced a lawsuit against the University of Michigan's affirmative action policies.

They are encouraged to dreamily dream a self-satisfied and self-serving dream. Howard Dean a few weeks ago insinuated in a speech that there are no racial issues in America, and that suits us just fine. We can listen to the 'I Have a Dream' speech and get teary-eyed. We can celebrate Dr. King's dream, but in no way are we willing to face his reality.

http://www.rootsie.com/articles/2004/1901.html
Logged
IyahminHotep
Newbie
*
Posts: 16

RastafariSpeaks.com


« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2004, 07:17:59 PM »

Greets,

There is a great distortion made in the true message of Dr.King. The goverment did not murder a "dreamer" .
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Copyright © 2001-2005 AfricaSpeaks.com and RastafariSpeaks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!