I noticed an article attributed to Dr. Alan Cantwell.  Dr. Cantwell and I are internet aquaintences and share a good deal of information on the subject of HIV/AIDS and other human concerns.  It has been a long and fruitful discussion for my edification on the subject.  I mentioned this site to Dr. Cantwell, I am not sure if he found you or you found his article.  

Also and importantly, I have come to know Mr. Boyd Graves in the same manner and spoken once with hïm by phone. I imagine Mr. Graves is familiar to some readers of this site.   If not, I hope that readers will visit Mr. Graves web site @ www.boydgraves.com.  The subject is grim and derpressing. Mr. Graves has enlightened me to a great many things about the origins of eugenics inspired bio-engineering going back much further than most woudl suspect.  Mr. Graves is very intense and intent on opening up the treatment protocols for AIDS based on his research, which is revealing.  He of course has been very badly treated over his stance and positive action.

As in all these controversial subjects, there is some conflict between researchers and advocates for truth in bio-weapons insanity and criminality, particularly regarding AIDS .   It is a very dangerous topic to even consider.  I am sure some of you have read of the slew of top molecular biologists who have been murdered in the past several years.  

It is time for clear thinking people in the USA, Europe, Britain and Russia to demand at all cost complete public scrutiny of all bioweapons research before it is tøø late.  People in Africa and elsewhere on the probable hit list only hope we will clean up our act.  

Here is a thought I shared with Dr. Cantwell and Mr. Graves recently:

"'How much more evidence do we need from the past on chemical attacks by the US govt. against its own people and so many others to get the  big picture.  It's not paranoia or "conspiracy theory".  With regard to conspiracy theory in general, here's something I wrote to a "conspiracy " historian:

"The point is, when someone labels me a "conspiracy theorist" over this stuff, I reply that causitive analysis based on historical review, identifying interlocking directorships of power that engage in strategic planning to effect a desired outcome is a more likely definition of what I am talking about......not a simple label like "conspiracy theory". Isn't that what historians do?  And should we not be vigilant in finding out about and describe such constructs as they relate to "current" events? Actually, I see time and events in a totality.....relative that is..........no event or thing in this universe has meaning without comparison or measurement against something else that exsists.   There is no vacume of the present.'"


Alan, I wrote this to you some time ago.  I have  more intellectual "designs" to defeat the false claim of "conspiracy theory"  based on every intellectually honest historian's methodology and concern for relevence.   You will notice  the use of the term "belief in" joined with "conspiracy theory" in the articles you reference.   Nowhere is the term "suspicion" or "likelyhood"  based on identified research by anyone mentioned (note: these were articles defaming any investigations into AIDS as a bio weapon as "beliefs" only).   As if there is no evidence to suggest chemical and biological attack conducted against entire populations as a consistent theme throghout human history.  Only now, technology makes the scale and sophistication of such designs both selective and massive in implementation . "Better than the Bomb" Mr. Graves would proabably emphasize.(this referes to a Time magazine cover in the mid 50's that can be referenced on Mr. Graves' site.)



I would refer you to Frank Herbert again who in 1965 outlined in his mythic parable "Dune" all of what we are seeing in micro and macrocosmic scale with regard to control and manipulation through death and torture involving chemical and biological agents, not to mention unrelenting warfare conducted against women and children to bend a society to one's will.   Racism and homophobia  is a veneer, wretched tools, and the deeper motivations always seem to be wealth and power and how to achieve it at any cost.

Unless the economic and strategic,geo-political, environmental and mass migration factors are integrated into the scientific evidence (and I am sure I''ve left something out there) for what some strongly suspect, the motive is unclear, and thus  it is difficult to convince anyone of the big question.....why?

If someone suggests, as I have heard, that it is universal race and gender bigotry , that, as I have heard some say, it is feelings of white male sexual inadequacy and fear of black males mating with white women; or for that matter that it is simply "hatred" of gays, then I suggest the plan for action against the crumbling of our society will circle endlessly by design imposed on it from very sophisticated reality shapers who are part and parcel of "the conspiracy".

The internet is a double edged sword in all this.   It is difficult at times to take the measure of what we read or who we are speaking with.

Sincerely and with hope,   P7