Rasta TimesCHAT ROOMArticles/ArchiveRaceAndHistory RootsWomen Trinicenter
Africa Speaks.com Africa Speaks HomepageAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.com
InteractiveLeslie VibesAyanna RootsRas TyehimbaTriniView.comGeneral Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 23, 2024, 07:31:52 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
25912 Posts in 9968 Topics by 982 Members Latest Member: - Ferguson Most online today: 238 (July 03, 2005, 06:25:30 PM)
+  Africa Speaks Reasoning Forum
| |-+  Books & Reviews (Moderators: Tyehimba, leslie)
| | |-+  The Iceman Inheritance
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: The Iceman Inheritance  (Read 24960 times)
Full Member
Posts: 396


« on: April 26, 2004, 05:24:49 AM »

Iceman Inheritance : Prehistoric Sources of Western Man's Racism, Sexism and Aggression by Michael Bradley, John Henrik Clarke

Slavery was a permanent feature in the ancient world, in Egypt, Kush, Greece and Rome. The African slave trade is better known to us because it is the most recent and the best documented. The "Christians" of European decent have never felt at ease in an honest discussion of this subject because every examination of it will prove that slavery and the slave trade were the incubator for present day racism.  
The Christian church was the handmaiden for the development of racism. While it propagated the theory that all men were created equal in the sight of God; in practice, it found all sorts of arguments to prove that non-European people, especially Black men, were inferior and could not be considered as men in the general sense. A search for ways to justify European domination led biologists to the works of Linnaeus and Buffon. Thus, the classification of races began. In deciding the distinctions between higher and lower races, the Europeans, of course, became the hierarchy of races.  
In many ways this was a continuation of the rationale set up to justify the slave trade. The African slave trade-like African history in general - is often written about and rarely understood. There was at first a concerted effort to obtain labor to open up the vast regions of the New World. It is often forgotten that, in what became the United States, white enslavement started before Black enslavement.  
"When someone removes the cataracts of whiteness from our eyes, and when we look with unclouded vision on the bloody shadows of the American past, we will recognize for the first time that the Afro-American, who was so often second in freedom, was also second in slavery.  Indeed, it will be revealed that the Afro-American was third in slavery. For he inherited his chains, in a manner of speaking, from the pioneer bondsman, who were red and white." - Lerone Bennet, Jr.    

Forced labor was widely used in England. This system was transferred to the colonies and used to justify a form that was visited upon red and white men.  
"It was decreed that the apprentice must serve his seven years, and take his floggings as his master saw fit; the hired servant must carry out his contract for his term of service; convicts of the state, often including political offenders, were slaves of the state and sometimes sold to private owners overseas. The colonists claimed those rights over some of their white fellow countrymen. A large class of "redemptioners" had agreed that their service should be sold for a brief term of year as and subject to the same penalties of branding, whipping and mutilation of African slaves. These forms of servitude were supposed to be limited in duration and transmitted no claim to the servant's children. In spite of this servitude, the presumption, in law, was that a white man was born free."    - Albert Bushnell Hart  

The English settlers had at once began to enslave their Indian neighbors, soothing their consciousness with the argument that it was right to make slaves out of pagans. In large numbers, the Indians fled or died in captivity, leaving few of their descendants in bondage. The virgin soil of the new English settlements continued to need more labor. This led to a fierce search for white labor that subsequently led to search for Black labor.  
American abolitionists, both Black and White, began fighting against a form of racism that had begun to crystallize itself in the embryo of the colonies' education systems, filtering down from the attitude prevailing in the colonies' churches. During the period of the founding fathers, The African-American heard promises about democracy, liberty, and justice and did not know that these promises were not meant for them. They deluded themselves into thinking they were, but the African soon learned that the African was not brought to this country to be treated democratically and the American promise was not made to him. That was the dilemma during the formative period of this country - it is the basis of its dilemma now. This country was born in racism and it has evolved in racism.  
IN the early years of the nineteenth century, the system of chattel slavery gave way to the colonial system. This was not the end of racism as it affected Africans and other non-white people throughout the world; it was only a radical change in how it would be manifested. The European would now change the system of capturing Africans and other non-white people and enslaving them thousand of miles away from their homes.  They would enslave them on the spot within their own countries and use them as markets for the new goods coming out of the developing European industrial revolution and out of their countries and their labors to produce grist for new European mills. The industrial rise of the West has as its base a form of racism-racism helped to lay the base of the present economic system we now call capitalism.  
In the main, theoretical racism is of the nineteenth century origin in America and in Europe, and yet the nineteenth century was a century of the greatest resistance against racism. It was during that century when Africans the world over began the search for a definition of themselves. The high-water mark of the Africans reaction to European racism came in the middle of the nineteenth century in the presence of the great Black intellectuals such as Martin R. Delany and Edward Wilmot Blyden. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, the great intellectual giant, W.E.B.Dubois took up the fight and ably carried it into the middle of the twentieth century. There is now an international struggle against racism on the part of people of African decent. The struggle has been taken to the world's campuses, where the theoretical basis of racism started. This has helped create new battle lines and a lot of fear and frustration on the part of white scholarship. Their fear prevents them from recognizing that the removal of the racism that they created is the healthiest thing present-day Black scholarship can contribute to the world.  
Intro to Michael Bradley's "Iceman Inheritance"  
by John Henrik Clarke

Iceman Inheritance : Prehistoric Sources of Western Man's Racism, Sexism and Aggression by Michael Bradley, John Henrik Clarke
Full Member
Posts: 417


« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2004, 08:40:35 AM »

Hmmm... I didn't realize John Henrik Clarke wrote the introduction to that book. I have so much respect for that man that I might just give the book another chance. I never read it in full but on glancing through it my impression was it was pseudo-scientific and unconvincing. Because if living in a harsh/cold environment is what leads to racism, sexism and aggression, how come the Inuit (so called Eskimos) for eg. are pretty low on the scale of racism, sexism and aggression, and how come very racist/ethnocentric, sexist, aggressive civilizations have flourished in more hospitable climes with people other than Europeans? Also coming from a white author, it could be looked at two ways, a white man honest enough to examine what he sees as his "race"'s predisposition to such patterns of behavior... or an implication of an excuse, like, white people can't really be blamed cos they're "programmed" that way from coming up in a harsh environment.
But like I said I never read the book in full and now I know John Henrik Clarke presumably recommends it, I'll give it another chance some day.
Not saying I worship J.H. Clarke or agree with everything he says, but he's one of the few people I have so much respect for that I would check something just on his recommendation even if my first impression of it was bad.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Copyright © 2001-2005 AfricaSpeaks.com and RastafariSpeaks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!