Rasta TimesCHAT ROOMArticles/ArchiveRaceAndHistory RootsWomen Trinicenter
Africa Speaks.com Africa Speaks HomepageAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.comAfrica Speaks.com
InteractiveLeslie VibesAyanna RootsRas TyehimbaTriniView.comGeneral Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 21, 2024, 09:29:18 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
25912 Posts in 9968 Topics by 982 Members Latest Member: - Ferguson Most online today: 248 (July 03, 2005, 06:25:30 PM)
+  Africa Speaks Reasoning Forum
| |-+  Science and Technology (Moderators: Tyehimba, leslie)
| | |-+  Are local people excluded from field research agendas?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Are local people excluded from field research agendas?  (Read 9567 times)
Posts: 435

« on: May 10, 2014, 08:58:07 AM »

I saw this article Africa's Greatest Innovators in Arts and Sciences and wondered beside environmentalist Wangari Maathai why other African scientists werent mentioned (granted this is a compilation based on one perspective and only includes nine persons). African scientists have been generally under-recognised, but more so the various contributions they have made have been absorbed into the work of more influencial/easily visible racial groupings in Africa. The article below gives another part of that story.

Are local people excluded from field research agendas?

By SciDeviNet

May, 7th, 2014
Should the local communities in developing nations have a say in setting the research agenda of foreign scientists working there?

There was a resounding ‘yes’ to this question at the opening ceremony and the first plenary session of the 13th International Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference (PCST2014) in Salvador, Brazil (5-8 May).

But just a few hours later at another session showcasing a major research funder's work on engagement with local communities I was struck by how old-fashioned their approach to public engagement was.

This was a mostly one-way exercise, with the funders seeming to consider the public as ‘empty vessels’ that need to be filled. There was little evidence of them really taking communities’ expertise into account and allowing it to shape their research agenda.

And how could they shape it, asked the group of Wellcome Trust experts who organised the session — what could the local communities tell us about studying biomarkers for malaria?

Although they partially agreed with my assessment of their work as not being fully engaged, they stuck to their guns in claiming that one can go too far in being politically correct and pushing the local engagement issue.

Despite their major research efforts in developing world and interesting community engagement initiatives, their approach seemed out of touch with the rest of the conference — which was bursting with sessions on moving the science communication agenda forward, towards a more equitable, fair and engaged way of doing science in poor communities.

The issues of social inclusion and political engagement reigned high. Marina Joubert, PCST scientific committee member from South Africa, described the agenda this way: “Who is missing out on science?” and “How well are we doing in ensuring we are reaching the policymakers?”

The inclusion of marginalised groups and their political empowerment go hand in hand, said Elizabeth Rasekoala, founder and director of the African-Caribbean Network for Science & Technology.

And she spared no harsh words in her criticism of those who merely pay lip service to the idea of engagement.

It was high time for real and honest engagement, she argued, for example sharing research grant money 50:50 between scientists and local communities, something she is seeing starting to happen.

Source: http://www.scidev.net/global/policy/scidev-net-at-large/are-local-people-excluded-from-field-research-agendas.html
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Copyright © 2001-2005 AfricaSpeaks.com and RastafariSpeaks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!